1 Bug Exhibit, 42% More Visitors: How a Museum Beat Big-Budget Brands to the Grand Effie

How a Museum Beat Big-Budget Brands to the Grand Effie
Picture of Brittany Rohr
Brittany Rohr

Founder and CEO

Background

The Field Museum in Chicago is a nonprofit competing for attention against a city full of things to do, and against national brands with far bigger marketing budgets. Winter is its hardest season. Cold weather keeps casual visitors away, and the museum needed a way to bring people back through the doors before spring.

The Challenge

The museum had a new exhibit to promote Bloodsuckers, built around blood-feeding creatures like leeches, vampire bats, and mosquitoes. That is a hard sell on its own. Most people do not walk past a poster about parasites and feel a pull to buy a ticket. The museum needed a way to make the exhibit sound like something people wanted to go to do, not something educational to sit through. 

The Strategy

Leo Burnett Chicago, working with Publicis North America, Aisle Rocket, and PXP Studios, started with something Chicagoans already do without needing convincing: brave freezing weather for good food. Instead of fighting that habit, the campaign was built around it. 

The idea became Blood Appétit, a limited-time culinary partnership between the museum and local restaurants. Restaurants created special menu items tied to the exhibit theme, and diners who tried them earned discounted tickets to see Bloodsuckers in person. 

Implementation

The campaign lived where its audience already was in restaurants across Chicago, not only in museum marketing channels. Food became the entry point into a science exhibit, and the discount gave people who were already going out to eat a reason to add the museum to their plans. The tie between the two was direct enough that trying the food and visiting the exhibit felt like one experience instead of two separate asks. 

The Results

big-budget-brands

The campaign drove a 42% increase in attendance during what is normally the museum’s slowest season, more than double what the museum had set out to achieve. That result was strong enough to win the Grand Effie at the 2025 Effie Awards US Gala, beating entries from major global brands with far larger budgets. Effie Worldwide called it proof that courageous, insight-driven work can come from organizations of any size. 

Key Takeaways

The campaign worked because it did not try to make bugs interesting on their own. It found something the audience was already motivated to do, going out for a good meal in winter, and built a bridge from that behavior straight to the museum’s front door. 

It also matched the size of the idea to the size of the museum’s real advantage: a strong local restaurant network and a distinctive, slightly strange exhibit, not a national ad budget. Competing on a bigger brand’s terms would have been a losing fight. Competing on local relevance was not. 

Lessons for Other Businesses

Any organization with a modest budget and a specific local advantage can use the same logic. Find a habit people already have, then figure out how the business fits naturally into it, rather than trying to convince someone to want something new from scratch. 

The Field Museum also shows that a big result does not require a big story. The idea here was simple enough to explain in one sentence, and that simplicity is part of why it worked well enough to beat brands with far more money behind them. 

Rohring Results looks for this same type of fit when building campaigns for smaller clients: a real local advantage, paired with a habit the audience already has, instead of a message that has to create demand from zero. 

You might also enjoy

6 Years, One Monitor What Google's Ad Tech Antitrust Ruling Means for Advertisers
Industry Impact

What Google’s Ad Tech Antitrust Ruling Means for Advertisers

A federal judge just decided how much Google has to change the way it runs online advertising. The answer: less than the government wanted, but more than nothing.  What Happened  On September 2, US District Judge Leonie Brinkema rejected the Justice Department’s request to force Google to sell off parts of its ad tech business.

Read More »
80 Fewer Views Why Reach Is Shrinking Everywhere
Market Update

31% Fewer Views: Why Reach Is Shrinking Everywhere

Post the same kind of content today that performed well a year ago, and it likely reaches fewer people. That is not a platform glitch. It is math. There is a lot more content competing for the same amount of attention.  What the Data Shows According to Metricool’s 2026 platform data, Instagram views were up

Read More »
161% Traffic in One Year How PAR Technology Recovered From a Google Algorithm Hit
Case Study

161% Traffic in One Year: How PAR Technology Recovered from a Google Algorithm Hit

Background PAR Technology Corporation builds the technology restaurants and retailers run on: point-of-sale systems, digital ordering, loyalty programs, payment tools, and hardware. It is a large, established company in a competitive space, and a meaningful share of its enterprise leads to come through organic search.  The Challenge For six months, PAR’s organic performance had been

Read More »
Google Will Now Pay Publishers for AI Answers. Here's the Catch
Industry Impact

Google Will Now Pay Publishers for AI Answers. Here’s the Catch

For years, the deal between Google and the websites it indexes has been simple. Google sends traffic, and a publisher earns money from that traffic through ads, subscriptions, or sales. Now, for a small group of publishers, that deal has a second part. Google will pay them directly, not for a click, but for showing

Read More »
Rohring Results
Scroll to Top